View UK case map

Curtailment of muddy floods in the Sompting catchment area

United Kingdom Sompting catchment area, South Downs

The conversion of agricultural land to grassland and other management changes resulted in a drastic reduction of muddy floods, soil erosion and runoff in the Sompting catchment area in the South Downs of the UK. 

Nature-based Intervention:

In 1992, around 100 hectares of agricultural land, mainly located on slopes vulnerable to runoff and erosion, were permanently set aside to revert back into grassland, funded through the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy and an Environmentally Sensitive Area scheme.

Overview of context and outcomes:

Prior to these changes, the area and town of Sompting experienced intense flooding and excessive soil erosion in the 1980s and early 1990s. As a result of the intervention, runoff and continuous down-valley flows were reduced and valley floor flows were prevented from linking up, reportedly reducing flooding. Much less frequent flooding events were observed after the intervention, even in particularly wet years, according to a peer-reviewed study of the area.

Case effectiveness on

Climate change

Mitigation: Not reported
Adaptation: Positive

The restoration of permanent grassland cover on slopes vulnerable to erosion in a catchment area prone to flooding has reportedly effectively reduced the frequency and impact of flooding during heavy rainfall events, which are expected to intensify due to climate change.

Ecosystem health

Ecological effect: Not reported

Socioeconomic outcomes

The housing estate that the study observed, as well as the town of Sompting and other areas in the catchment, reportedly benefited from a significantly reduced risk of flooding, particularly highly damaging muddy flooding.

Governance

Local participation in Governance: No

The UK Government currently manages the land.

Finance

The purchase and restoration of the land was funded by the European Union Common Agriculture Policy and the UK Government.

Monitoring and evaluation

Some scientific studies have evaluated the impacts of the catchment restoration, but surveys tend to be irregularly conducted.

Trade-offs and limitations

No information yet available on tradeoffs.

PDF   Close
UK grassland and river inlet
Photo © OLIVER BRADLEY

Intervention type

  • Protection
  • Restoration
Conducted at landscape scale

Ecosystem type

  • Temperate grasslands

Climate change impacts addressed

  • Freshwater flooding
  • Soil erosion

Instigators

  • Community/self driven
  • International environment and development organization
  • National government/agency

Societal challenges

  • Climate change adaptation
  • Disaster risk reduction

Outcomes

  • Food security: Not reported
  • Water security: Not reported
  • Health: Not reported
  • Local economics: Not reported
  • Livelihoods/goods/basic needs: Not reported
  • Energy security: Not reported
  • Disaster risk reduction: Positive
  • Rights/empowerment/equality: Not reported
  • Recreation: Not reported
  • Education: Not reported
  • Conflict and security: Not reported
  • No. developmental outcomes reported: 2

Resources

Read resource 1

Literature info

  • Peer reviewed
Case methodology reported