Effective population size is a key parameter that influences wildlife conservation and management decisions (Luikart et al. 2010). Effective population size is one of the most effective measures of genetic erosion and provides information on the rate of inbreeding and loss of genetic variation (Leroy et al. 2018, Hoban et al. 2020, Frankham 1995). Effective population size influences other important drivers of genetic diversity such as efficacy of mutation, selection and migration (Wang et al. 2016).
The process involved in establishing effective population size (Ne) is methodologically complex and requires specialist expertise that is likely to be beyond the reach of the average Nature-based Solutions project. Ne is relevant in projects that target the conservation of a specific species and will have an impact on a distinct population. An outline of the process involved in calculating Ne is given below.
There are two main approaches to estimating effective population size (Wang et al. 2016):
Linkage disequilibrium is a widely used and well-evaluated measure, and can be calculated from samples (e.g. DNA extracted from faeces, hair, blood, animal/plant tissue) from multiple individuals within a population taken at a single point in time:
Change in allele frequencies also tracks Ne:
Demographic parameters:
Additional related metrics can be calculated:
Effective population size, Allelic diversity and rate of genetic drift are three interrelated concepts and metrics that give slightly different pieces information on the underlying genetic properties of populations.
The desired effective population size will be species/project specific. A higher effective population size is better, reflecting greater underlying genetic diversity.